Author Box
Articles Categories
All Categories
Articles Resources

No Hope for Hardest Hit Homeowners

April 18, 2012 | Comments: 0 | Views: 156

A little known housing program ironically named The Hardest Hit Fund was initially established in 2010 in order to assist homeowners in areas hardest hit by the decline in home values and struggling with higher than average unemployment. According to the government website:

In 2010, the Obama Administration launched the Hardest Hit Fund to help homeowners avoid foreclosure in the areas hardest hit by steep home price declines and unemployment. Through the program, participating housing finance agencies (HFAs) in 18 states and the District of Columbia are implementing a variety of different initiatives to help homeowners struggling with their mortgage payments. All participating HFAs are now operating programs widely and offering assistance to homeowners.

The program is administered under TARP by the Treasury Department in conjunction with agencies in the states covered by the fund. The fund initially claimed that it would offer assistance to nearly 500,000 struggling homeowners and was allocated a budget of over $7 billion. However, as of the end of 2011, the Hardest Hit Fund had helped only slightly more than 30,000 individuals and families and spent $217.4 million of its $7.6 billion budget, or 3%. The program is intended to reach homeowners who are unemployed, or living in areas with high unemployment rates or steeply falling home values, but a recent report by a Special Inspector General lambastes the program's misadventures.

One major flaw in the program noted by an Special Inspector General Christy Romero-separate and apart from administration's overall disinterest in offering meaningful relief to underwater and struggling homeowners-is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been slow to cooperate or provide guidance to lenders.

The program was hindered from the start by Treasury's failure to gain support from the government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the report says. Many big, private mortgage companies initially refused to participate because they wanted guidance from Fannie and Freddie, it says. The companies, called mortgage servicers, collect people's monthly payments and foreclose when they fall behind.

"Without large servicers, the (state programs) could not reach a large portion of struggling homeowners," the report says.

The Treasury Department's response to the Special Inspector General's report has been defiance. The department argues that each of the recommendations is unworkable and blames delays at the state level for much of the failure to actually provide assistance. Treasury also notes that the program extends out to 2017 so you know, homeowners will get some help when the department damn well pleases.

Much of the funding that has been spent thus far has also gone to bail-out state unemployment programs and to assist unemployed homeowners. Very little assistance has reached underwater homeowners. Rather, the bulk of the funds have beenallocated to the unemployed.

The money was supposed to give state housing officials incentives to come up with new and different ways to address the housing crisis in their states. But most states just used the money for programs that pay the mortgages, insurance and property taxes of the unemployed.

So far, the hardest hit program has kept up with mortgage payments for some 26,100 unemployed homeowners. These programs don't hit mortgage servicers or banks' bottom lines, Romero said.

When it comes to relieving housing woes, so far, only 436 homeowners in the program got the principal owed on their mortgage reduced. Another 170 homeowners got their second lien reduced.

A close reading of each of the news accounts shines a light on the continuing and underlying problem of the Obama administration's homeowner relief programs: a failure to force the banks and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to act. A direct consequence of the administration's failure to take a hard line with the large banks and governmental entities has hindered progress at every turn. The HARP and HAMP programs have suffered from similar ineffectiveness under stifling efforts and inaction from the banking and mortgage sector. President Obama is fond of downplaying struggles to reach perfection in legislation, often reiterating the necessity of compromise in a democracy. In this case however, the programs are administered by his own Treasury Department, and failures are not the result of compromise with Republicans, but a profound unwillingness to force the banks to offer help to homeowners-even in cases where the bank stands to profit-in return for the trillions of tax dollars given to them in the form of direct bailouts and low-interest loans.

It is simply unacceptable for the Treasury Department to push back at the Special Inspector General and offer up disingenuous excuses for inaction. While the department claims that the program sets up long-lasting foreclosure prevention capabilities, that is of little consolation to the thousands who have lost their homes while the administration fetters.

Ben Stormer:

We at are dedicated to fostering a government responsive to the people -- a government which acts based upon sound science and sound economics. While we consider ourselves to be progressives, we do not necessarily conform to each and every position consistent with the larger progressive movement, nor do we hold any political party affiliation. We will however applaud members of the two major political parties when they act ethically and responsibly on the peoples' behalf.

Over the past few decades the government has become more and more beholden to moneyed interests whose henchman now wield far too much power over policy-making at each level of government. Neither the Republican or Democratic Party speaks for the vast majority of the citizens. In fact, both parties covertly attempt to convince their members of the soundness of the policies championed by their financial backers. Now more than ever we need a political movement, perhaps even a third party to at the very least force the policy agenda in the correct direction. In furtherance of this goal we will strive to provide our readers with fact and opinion that we believe will prove both informative and entertaining.

Source: EzineArticles
Was this Helpful ?

Rate this Article

Article Tags:

Hardest Hit Homeowners


Special Inspector


Hardest Hit Fund











Rather than blame others, take personal responsibility to reduce our dependence on oil by using less of petroleum derived products. Repeatedly we are hearing about oil spills, rising prices on oil

By: Kyles Humphrey l News & Society > Energy l October 17, 2012 lViews: 233

Traditional analysis of debt and deleveraging (the process where households, corporations and governments are forced to reduce their overall debt) is often biased and incomplete. Opinions of how to

By: Ben Esget l News & Society > Economics l August 11, 2012 lViews: 295

In this high paced digital age, it's easy to become displaced from the people and places around you. However, it's important to support your community and your neighbors who live in it, and work hard

By: Monai Gupta l News & Society > Politics l July 11, 2012 lViews: 332

In a bold, unpredictable move, President Obama declared on Monday his desire to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for all but the highest-income earners, by which he means anyone richer than Al and Peg

By: Scott Spiegel l News & Society > Politics l July 10, 2012 lViews: 227

Bipartisanship isn't always sweet. Especially when it comes to the politics of sugar.

By: Larry M. Elkin l News & Society > Politics l July 09, 2012 lViews: 237

In a direct reflection of the financial market's currently unsteady nature, the wholesale energy markets tumbled to a four-month low at the end of May. The bearish market was thanks to the continuing

By: Graham N Paul l News & Society > Energy l July 09, 2012 lViews: 221

Seeking the origins of things, the why and how and nature of things, is something we all do, whether we realize it or not. Searching for answers, how something began, the causes, trying to better

By: Steve Ohlsenl News & Society > Pure Opinionl April 26, 2012 lViews: 171

Over the years, I've been involved in many organizations, activities, business, government, and now in retirement, perhaps semi retirement, I have spent a good bit of time people watching. I've

By: Lance Winslowl News & Society > Pure Opinionl April 26, 2012 lViews: 134

What is the FDA telling us about cherries and why do they threaten growers? Why does the FDA approve so many deadly drugs with toxic side effects? When will the FDA ever get the entire over haul it

By: Gary Kent Boydl News & Society > Pure Opinionl April 25, 2012 lViews: 166

One of the biggest mysteries to me is why anyone in their stark raving right mind would assume anything and everything had been created from scratch. You cannot make that assumption from first

By: John Prytzl News & Society > Pure Opinionl April 25, 2012 lViews: 165

This article was written to try to get us to look at our our behaviour and how we define 'friendships.' It is heavily written with a personal view and no offense is meant. This is just an honest

By: Helen E Williamsl News & Society > Pure Opinionl April 24, 2012 lViews: 152

If you believe in God, then do you really believe that He would allow conspiracies to succeed? He has put an end to conspiracies in the past.

By: John Dmytrukl News & Society > Pure Opinionl April 22, 2012 lViews: 162

Yesterday President Obama stood at the White House with Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Gary Gensler, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Attorney General Eric Holder, Federal

By: Ben Stormerl News & Society > Pure Opinionl April 18, 2012 lViews: 166

Discuss this Article

comments powered by Disqus