Author Box
Articles Categories
All Categories
Articles Resources

Extend The Bush Tax Cuts For Everyone But Obama's Donors

July 10, 2012 | Comments: 0 | Views: 227

It's not a tax increase, it's a penalty expansion!

In a bold, unpredictable move, President Obama declared on Monday his desire to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for all but the highest-income earners, by which he means anyone richer than Al and Peg Bundy.

Meanwhile, House Republicans plan to continue their Chinese water torture on the nation by voting on whether to continue the cuts for all levels of income earners for just 365 more days.

Yahoo News repeats Obama's claim that not raising taxes on the wealthy will mean "cash-strapped state and federal governments have to make deeper cuts to education, infrastructure and scientific research," by which he means copies of An Inconvenient Truth, solar panels at the White House, and Solyndra subsidies.

Could we stop talking for a moment about the lunacy of raising taxes in a recession, and focus on the fact that the federal government's failure to enact a fixed, long-term tax structure for more than a few months at a time is nearly as detrimental to the country's growth as failure to keep down rates on "the rich"?

High-income earners, after all, are the ones whose investment and hiring activity benefits most from long-term tax certainty. Stringing out the productive class over and over again is like letting factory owners know on the last day of each month whether they'll have electricity next month. Even Stalin luxuriated in the relative certainty of Five-Year Plans.

Lower marginal tax rates and prolonged tax rate predictability are actually just two versions of the same thing. Both policies signify that less private income will be confiscated by the federal government to fund projects of dubious efficacy and zero wealth-generating capacity.

Lower tax rates keep large quantities of money in private hands in the short-term. Fixed tax rates keep stable quantities of money in private hands in the long-term. Combine low marginal tax rates with a predictable tax structure, and you've got a recipe for skyrocketing growth.

Liberals constantly bemoan "top-down" or "trickle-down" economics. Why don't conservatives decry "spur-of-the-moment" or "Johnny-come-lately" economics?

Investing and hiring require long-range planning. Investments appreciate over long stretches of time, and employees who receive time-consuming training are expected to provide years of service to justify their employers' outlay. Aren't investors more likely to invest, and employers more likely to employ, when they can predict their tax burdens more than a couple of quarters down the road?

Surprisingly, Senate Finance Committee member Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have served as the comparative voices of reason in this latest tax struggle. They want to compromise with Congressional Republicans by setting the upper-income cutoff at $1 million, four times as high as Obama's limit. Schumer nonetheless maintains that people who earn more than that won't spend any of the tax savings they receive to help boost the economy. What does he think they're going to do-stick the money under their mattresses? High-income earners are far more likely to use their marginal savings for investments or hiring than, say, buying six-packs or copies of Diablo III.

Naturally Obama plans to stage lots of showy campaign events in battleground states like Iowa in which he surrounds himself with "working-class" Americans who would allegedly benefit most from his middle-class-only tax cut. Why doesn't Obama surround himself with the boards of directors of companies that hire all the people he's concerned about?

The New York Times began its stop-by-stop chronicle of Obama's Wealth Resentment Tour thusly: "In Cedar Rapids, Mr. Obama plans to visit the home of Jason and Ali McLaughlin, a high school principal and an account manager at a document-scanning company." Obama will decry the $2,000 increase in the McLaughlins' tax burden they will suffer next year if his cuts don't go through. Why not appear with the upper management of that document-scanning company, who are surely trying to forecast growth over a potentially tumultuous five more years under Obama? Why not link arms with several of the childless small business owners in the McLaughlins' district who are about to get gouged every year to pay for that high school?

Despite their protestations, liberals somehow always seem to cave in at the last minute on tax cut extensions for all income earners, because they supposedly care so much about not wanting to do anything that might hinder the fragile economic recovery. Somehow this disingenuous reversal of position always happens in the eleventh hour of every tax battle, when liberals realize they're about to lose the public's sympathy. But if lowering taxes helps speed economic recovery during a recession, wouldn't it also accelerate economic growth in boon times? If endless one- and two-year extensions assist recovery, wouldn't five- or ten-year extensions-or permanently lower tax rates-really boost the economy?

The left hates greedy corporations, except for the ones funding Obama's reelection campaign. How about we test the president's theory that cutting taxes for the wealthy hinders growth, by extending the Bush tax cuts to everyone except his donors?

Surely the one-percenters who fuel Obama's reelection campaign won't hold back, just because they know they're going to be walloped with a giant, Democrat-endorsed annual tax increase in 2013.

Previously published in modified form at Red Alert Politics

Source: EzineArticles
Was this Helpful ?

 
0
 
0
 
Rate this Article
 vote(s)
Feedback
Print
Re-Publish

Article Tags:

Bush Tax Cuts

,

Federal Income Tax

,

Marginal Tax Rates

,

Nancy Pelosi

,

Tax Cut Extensions

,

Chuck Shumer

Rather than blame others, take personal responsibility to reduce our dependence on oil by using less of petroleum derived products. Repeatedly we are hearing about oil spills, rising prices on oil

By: Kyles Humphrey l News & Society > Energy l October 17, 2012 lViews: 233

Traditional analysis of debt and deleveraging (the process where households, corporations and governments are forced to reduce their overall debt) is often biased and incomplete. Opinions of how to

By: Ben Esget l News & Society > Economics l August 11, 2012 lViews: 295

In this high paced digital age, it's easy to become displaced from the people and places around you. However, it's important to support your community and your neighbors who live in it, and work hard

By: Monai Gupta l News & Society > Politics l July 11, 2012 lViews: 332

Bipartisanship isn't always sweet. Especially when it comes to the politics of sugar.

By: Larry M. Elkin l News & Society > Politics l July 09, 2012 lViews: 237

In a direct reflection of the financial market's currently unsteady nature, the wholesale energy markets tumbled to a four-month low at the end of May. The bearish market was thanks to the continuing

By: Graham N Paul l News & Society > Energy l July 09, 2012 lViews: 221

Rumours are circulating that the government is to review its much-lauded 'Green Deal', after warnings that it could "waste" between 2-3 billion GBP. Not true say the government, with the DECC swiftly

By: Graham N Paul l News & Society > Energy l July 09, 2012 lViews: 186

In this high paced digital age, it's easy to become displaced from the people and places around you. However, it's important to support your community and your neighbors who live in it, and work hard

By: Monai Guptal News & Society > Politicsl July 11, 2012 lViews: 332

Bipartisanship isn't always sweet. Especially when it comes to the politics of sugar.

By: Larry M. Elkinl News & Society > Politicsl July 09, 2012 lViews: 237

Propaganda is used to manipulate the people into actually voting for politicians who are in direct opposition the their interest. We the people don't even realize when we are being taken advantage of

By: David M Lawrencel News & Society > Politicsl July 08, 2012 lViews: 194

If it's ok for a black comedian to make a joke about White People's Day on a major U.S. holiday like the 4th of July, Independence Day, then it should be equally ok for a white comedian to make a

By: Curtis D Bradleyl News & Society > Politicsl July 07, 2012 lViews: 199

P. A. Sangma is an Indian politician who has been announced as the president candidate for July 2012 president election of India by the opposing parties including Bharatiya Janata Party. He

By: Suhaina Mazhar Sumazlal News & Society > Politicsl July 07, 2012 lViews: 169

Pranab Mukherjee, the president candidate of India is considered to be a legend in his lifetime. He is a real hard worker and he spends almost twelve to fifteen hours a day for his multitasking

By: Suhaina Mazhar Sumazlal News & Society > Politicsl July 07, 2012 lViews: 170

No matter how untidy reversal of Obamacare is, the effects can't be more destructive to the country's healthcare system than letting it stand. And the deleterious effects of either course of action

By: Scott Spiegell News & Society > Politicsl June 12, 2012 lViews: 137

Discuss this Article

comments powered by Disqus