Author Box
Articles Categories
All Categories
Articles Resources

Why Can't Everyone Have Nukes?

May 28, 2012 | Comments: 0 | Views: 150

Lost in all the uproar about the proliferation of nuclear technology, and the inevitable consequent weaponry in North Korea and Iran, is the murky argument against their possession of such know-how. Why is the nuclear club restricting its monopoly membership?

The club's original five members, US, Russia, China, Great Britain, and France, has grown to nine or ten members, depending on who's counting. Non-signatories of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), who now have such weapons, include Pakistan, India, and Israel. North Korea withdrew its membership in 2002.

A little talked about, yet very important issue is the existing worldwide total number of warheads--estimated to be in excess of 20,000--that are aimed at various military targets and population centers around the globe. Why so many--given that number could destroy our planet several times over? One can only guess at the brilliance behind such planning, and it conjures up images of the preparation that went into such masterful strokes such as Vietnam and Agent Orange, and the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Also, given that these weapons have a limited shelf (or silo) life, and disregarding the huge cost of building them in the first place, what of the price of maintenance, and now of replacement? Congress mandated the never discussed Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program in 2004 "to improve the reliability, longevity, and certifiability of existing [nuclear] weapons and their components." Lots of money for defense contractors involved here.

Whenever this subject comes up, the US's arsenal is benignly described as a "deterrent force," meaning that no one would dare attack us for fear of retaliation-read annihilation (or "obliteration" as Hillary Clinton once warned Iran it faced). The deterrent argument's thrust is that by owning nuclear weapons others are deterred from attacking you. This rationale obviously does not apply to nuclear wannabes Iran and North Korea. After all, if ever we wanted to mount an attack on either of these nations, it wouldn't do for them to have big bombs riding atop missiles that might be launched in retaliation.

Another argument for restriction is that these governments are unstable "rogue" states and their weaponry could easily fall into terrorist hands. This argument has been effective with the American public because it plays the fear card. The "wolf is at the door" claim is not new to us. A frightened populace has been proven time and again to be a controllable populace--one that is quite willing to give up basic freedoms while entrusting their safety to a few "brilliant" bureaucrats. These are the "smartest people in the room" who plot the fate of the world--in fortified, undisclosed locations that will ensure their survival in case of nuclear war. Never mind that they are of the same ilk as those who decided that we should fill our arsenals with more than enough nuclear warheads to end civilization as we know it, and other previously mentioned colossal blunders.

Also disregarded is the notion that if nukes are a defensive weapon for us (even though the previous administration threatened to violate that premise) why wouldn't they be the same for every nation? Why would North Korea, or Iran, want to launch what would amount to a Kamikaze attack on anyone? Surely they know that their country would be in ashes shortly after such a blunder. This result is spelled out in the Mutually Assured Destruction corollary to the deterrence strategy. (It has a wonderfully descriptive acronym--MAD!)

By the way, what standing do the nuclear-tipped nations have to deny other nations the same capability? Is it like an exclusive country club that has racial or social barriers to entry? Would the presence of such weapons deter the current nuclear powers ability to blackmail others into doing their bidding?

Let's face it, the US has become a militaristic enterprise that feeds on controlling the activities of other nations. We now have a military presence in 135 countries around the globe. For what purpose? Take a wild guess.

Finally, if our deterrence strategy is indeed sound, then we have nothing to worry about. In fact it's so good it should be expanded to include everyone. Just think, if every country had nuclear weapons then no one would be attacking anyone else for fear of retaliation, and there would be no wars--because everyone would be...deterred!

Sounds good to me.

Raff Ellis is an author who took early retirement from a career in the computer industry to pursue a writing career. He has two non-fiction books in print. Information about him and his work may be found at

Source: EzineArticles
Was this Helpful ?

Rate this Article

Article Tags:

Nuclear Weapons




Military Industrial Complex


Mutually Assured Destruction

Rather than blame others, take personal responsibility to reduce our dependence on oil by using less of petroleum derived products. Repeatedly we are hearing about oil spills, rising prices on oil

By: Kyles Humphrey l News & Society > Energy l October 17, 2012 lViews: 233

Traditional analysis of debt and deleveraging (the process where households, corporations and governments are forced to reduce their overall debt) is often biased and incomplete. Opinions of how to

By: Ben Esget l News & Society > Economics l August 11, 2012 lViews: 295

In this high paced digital age, it's easy to become displaced from the people and places around you. However, it's important to support your community and your neighbors who live in it, and work hard

By: Monai Gupta l News & Society > Politics l July 11, 2012 lViews: 332

In a bold, unpredictable move, President Obama declared on Monday his desire to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for all but the highest-income earners, by which he means anyone richer than Al and Peg

By: Scott Spiegel l News & Society > Politics l July 10, 2012 lViews: 228

Bipartisanship isn't always sweet. Especially when it comes to the politics of sugar.

By: Larry M. Elkin l News & Society > Politics l July 09, 2012 lViews: 237

In a direct reflection of the financial market's currently unsteady nature, the wholesale energy markets tumbled to a four-month low at the end of May. The bearish market was thanks to the continuing

By: Graham N Paul l News & Society > Energy l July 09, 2012 lViews: 221

Now Iran wants to build a nuclear submarine, to defend itself they say? Yes, let's just build silent running nuclear subs for everyone and fill the oceans with them? Why not? Gives little human

By: Lance Winslowl News & Society > Militaryl June 14, 2012 lViews: 233

As a long-distance bike rider, I know that the lighter my bike is the faster and further I can go without getting fatigued. When you're riding 100+ miles in a day, every ounce counts. You must be

By: Lance Winslowl News & Society > Militaryl June 14, 2012 lViews: 159

It seems that every nation wants robotic unmanned aerial vehicles. All the militaries of the world want them, perhaps because they'd like to emulate the United States of America, and they love the

By: Lance Winslowl News & Society > Militaryl June 13, 2012 lViews: 148

Now then, one of the challenges with helicopters flying low looking for insurgents or terrorists is that they can hear the choppers coming, and quickly arm their shoulder launched anti-aircraft

By: Lance Winslowl News & Society > Militaryl June 12, 2012 lViews: 175

How can we prevent stealth aircraft from getting into our homeland airspace? How can we prevent a future attack? Today, an attack on the US seems unlikely granted, but the world today is different

By: Lance Winslowl News & Society > Militaryl June 10, 2012 lViews: 172

Often referred to as Marine hell week, the Crucible is a final test for new recruits to prove themselves capable of withstanding the oft times grueling conditions a Marine will face at some point in

By: Rocky D D'Amicol News & Society > Militaryl June 05, 2012 lViews: 202

Once an author's writing machine gears up, it's hard to control. Here are some tips on how to edit your MS.

By: Raff Ellisl Writing & Speaking > Creative Writingl May 20, 2012 lViews: 156

Mother Nature has endowed us with the impulse to garner wealth in order to insure our survival. She did not, however, endow us with the ability to turn this impulse off when we have gathered more

By: Raff Ellisl News & Society > Anthropology Sociologyl May 19, 2012 lViews: 163

The writer is distressed about the increased misuse of words and grammar by reporters and writers in a variety of media. Examples are given to illustrate his point.

By: Raff Ellisl Writing & Speaking > Writing Articles l May 18, 2012 lViews: 104

Discuss this Article

comments powered by Disqus