Author Box
Articles Categories
All Categories
Articles Resources

Child Witnesses in Divorce Cases With Disputed Custody Issues

April 18, 2012 | Comments: 0 | Views: 180

Should judges making custody determinations by listening to the kids? These days this is a hot topic in Family Law. Years ago the answer to the question was an emphatic "no". Children were unreliable witnesses, they did not know what was good for themselves, and they would be traumatized forever by being asked to choose one parent over the other. Moreover, they would figure out that they were in a position to control the outcome, which would turn the parent-child relationship upside down.

Those propositions are now losing ground to the proposition that children have rights, among them the right to have a say in what happens to them when Mom and Dad decide to part company. Where that proposition came from is a long and complicated story. We only need to observe that for several generations "rights" have been multiplying in society, so children were bound to acquire their share sooner or later.

The new conventional wisdom took a major step forward this year with amendments to the Family Code. Under prior law, a judge had absolutely no obligation to listen to kids in a divorce, and almost always refused to do so if asked. If he felt like it, the judge could listen to kids "of sufficient age and capacity" but judges seldom did. When they did, the judges typically took the kids into "chambers," a judge's private office, for a private chat. The parents and their attorneys cooled their heels in the court room, along with the court reporter. None of them knew what the judge asked the child or what the child said in reply.

Now, with the recent changes to the Family Code, if a child over 14 wishes to address the judge, the judge must let the child express his or her views unless the judge determines that doing so is not in the child's best interests. If the judge does not allow the child to express his or her views, the judge must state his reasons on the record and provide some other way of finding out what the child has to say. As for children under 14, they may address the judge if the judge determines that doing so is "appropriate pursuant to the child's best interests."

The judge of his own accord may also ask if the child wishes to express a preference. Lastly, Mom or her attorney, and Dad or his attorney, can start the ball rolling by indicating to the judge that the child wishes to express his or her desires. It also appears that the parties' attorneys and the court reporter must now be present if the judge decides, to hear the child's testimony in chambers.

Comparable amendments were made to the role of "minor's counsel," an attorney appointed to represent a child. Instead of making a custody or visitation recommendation to the court, minor's counsel is now supposed to gather evidence and present it to the court just like an ordinary attorney representing an ordinary client. The logical result seems to be that the child takes the witness stand, testifies in response to questions asked by minor's counsel, and then undergoes cross-examination by the parties' attorneys.

To experienced family law attorneys all of this sounds like a radical change. For criminal and civil attorneys, children's testimony is normal. In criminal and civil cases, child witnesses frequently testify and undergo cross-examination.

The consequences of these changes to the Family Code are impossible to predict. However, with children's testimony now virtually mandatory for children over 14, we can expect that children will want to make their desires known to the court. We can also expect that they will be urged to do so even if they don't ask for the opportunity of their own accord. Parents who believe that their children will testify in their favor may also be expected to instruct their attorneys to call the child as a witness. Similarly, a parent's attorney who believes the same thing can be expected to advise his client that the child must be called. Otherwise the attorney will run a high risk of a malpractice action brought against him when the other parent "wins" the contest.

San Diego Divorce Attorney Stanley D. Prowse is a California Certified Family Law Specialist. We welcome your legal inquiries.

San Diego Divorce Attorney Stanley D. Prowse is a California Certified Family Law Specialist.

Attorney Stan Prowse has over 30 years of legal experience J.D. Harvard Law School '73 M.A. Columbia University B.A. Yale University Mediator, Judge Pro-Tem Certified Family Law Specialist licensed by the State Bar of California. Stan is a member of the San Diego North County Bar Association. Licensed to practice in California, Maryland, Washington D.C., & Georgia

Source: EzineArticles
Was this Helpful ?

Rate this Article

Article Tags:

Child Witnesses


Family Code


Disputed Custody Issues


Child Wishes


Disputed Custody


Divorce Cases

Thus, you can apply for the negligence compensation under such circumstances in order to recover your loss, Negligence Claims, Negligence compensation Involvedness of Negligence Claims. The court

By: Simon Liva l Legal > Personal Injury l December 13, 2012 lViews: 291

If a lawyer is not able to devote enough time to your case then your defense is likely to suffer. Moreover specialization in one stream or other of defense is important so that the attorney can

By: Simon Liva l Legal > Criminal Law l December 12, 2012 lViews: 428

Filing a business bankruptcy can be a complex and critical task, but you have several options. You can consult your bankruptcy attorney to know which among those options is right for you.This is a

By: Harvard McIntosh l Legal > Corporations LLC l December 11, 2012 lViews: 234

You can always check for the treatments that are covered. This is because there are some policies which do not give you claims if you meet any kind of head injury.You can always check for the

By: Simon Liva l Legal > Personal Injury l November 05, 2012 lViews: 240

In Colorado, you have many Personal Injury Lawyers to choose from. When you choose the Law Offices of Andrew C. Bubb you instantly put years of experience and legal know how in your corner. Attorney

By: Dilshad l Legal > Personal Injury l October 25, 2012 lViews: 388

If you have been charged with a crime, speak with Boulder criminal defense attorney Steven Louth immediately to protect your rights. Steven Louth is a criminal defense attorney and criminal trial

By: Dilshad l Legal > Personal Injury l October 18, 2012 lViews: 243

Having looked at the issues surrounding the division and distribution of wealth during a divorce, the other financial issue that needs to be resolved, often concurrently during a divorce but also

By: Stuart P Mitchelll Legal > Family Law and Divorcel April 25, 2012 lViews: 238

A divorce attorney can help you with the process and do more. During a consultation, find out what your life will be like after a divorce.

By: Aloysius Aucoinl Legal > Family Law and Divorcel April 25, 2012 lViews: 190

With divorce rates on the rise again, most likely due to the financial pressures that most of us now live under, more and more people are not only facing the prospect of being divorced but the

By: Stuart P Mitchelll Legal > Family Law and Divorcel April 25, 2012 lViews: 259

The holy grail of divorce proceedings, for all those involved, is to reach an amicable agreement between the divorcing parties on all issues regarding finances (and custody) as swiftly as possible,

By: Stuart P Mitchelll Legal > Family Law and Divorcel April 25, 2012 lViews: 251

The previous articles in this series looked at the procedures and processes involved in reaching financial resolutions during divorce proceedings, as well the ways in which divorcing couples can work

By: Stuart P Mitchelll Legal > Family Law and Divorcel April 25, 2012 lViews: 228

One of the factors that courts consider in making custody decisions is the distance between the parties. This article explains this further.

By: Will Beaumontl Legal > Family Law and Divorcel April 24, 2012 lViews: 359

Discuss this Article

comments powered by Disqus